🔗 Share this article

Initially, Donald Trump gave the impression to embrace a strong approach concerning the Ukrainian conflict. Following delivering statements of "serious consequences" during the summer if Vladimir Putin carried on hindering truce discussions, the former president eventually introduced substantial restrictions on Russia's biggest petroleum corporations, these major energy companies. This decision seriously hindered Putin's capability to support his war effort in the region.

Yet, with his recently unveiled 28-point peace initiative for the conflict, reportedly developed by American and Russian representatives without Ukrainian or European input, he has seemingly returned to his pro-Putin stance.

Favoring Aggression

Trump's proposal would effectively reward the Russian leader for invading a sovereign nation while placing the country's political freedom in peril. Although ringing statements that "The nation's independence will be confirmed", much of the plan actually weaken that same sovereignty. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would likely be a catastrophe for the nation.

Demonstrating his real-estate experience, Trump seems to consider the war as a simple border issue, like handing Putin a part of Ukrainian land will satisfy the president. Yet, Putin's military campaign is not simply about dominating a charred area of economically weakened territory in Ukraine's east. It is about Ukraine's democracy – and Putin's obvious desire to eliminate it so it stops serves as an attractive example for the Russian citizens of the accountable government that Putin's increasing autocracy prevents them.

Territorial Concessions

While maintaining in position the already separated oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the plan would require Ukraine to give up the entire Donetsk province. Beyond benefiting the Russian Federation with territory that its troops have been unsuccessful to capture in over a ten years of fighting, this giveaway would render Ukraine's defenses severely undermined.

Donetsk is the site of Ukraine's highly-touted "fortress belt", the fortified military defenses that are a essential barrier to enemy progress. Trump would have the Ukrainian military leave these defenses, leaving Russian forces a unobstructed route to Kyiv if he subsequently decide to renew the war.

Defense Limitations

Furthermore, in a move that would make future conflict more feasible for the Russian military, Trump would force Ukraine to cut the numbers of its armed forces from their existing 800,000 to 850,000 personnel to a limit of six hundred thousand. Importantly, the initiative imposes no equivalent restrictions on the invading army.

In what appears as a accommodation to Putin's efforts to characterize the nation's legitimate leadership as Nazis, Trump's plan states: "All extremist ideology and actions must be condemned and forbidden." Seemingly to highlight this aspect, it insists that "Ukraine will hold political contests in three months" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, Trump sets no obligation that Putin jeopardize his regime by allowing democratic processes in his own country.

Protection Commitments

To be sure, the initiative includes Russia promise not to "attack neighboring countries" and to "establish in regulation its stance of peaceful relations towards the EU and Ukraine". But considering that the Russian leadership has violated similar agreements in the previous instances – such as the 1994 agreement, in which Russia pledged to honor the nation's borders in return for relinquishing its Soviet-era atomic arms, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow promised to a halt in fighting and a handback of occupied territory in the region to Ukrainian control – why should anyone trust this commitment this time?

This explains Ukraine has been so determined on external defense commitments. Although the plan promises a "strong coordinated military response" if the Russian Federation resume its invasion, and states that "The nation will receive strong protection assurances", the particulars range from unclear to concerning. The initiative would not just deny Ukraine alliance membership but also prohibit member states from deploying military personnel on Ukrainian territory, effectively preventing the security presence, reportedly headed by the UK and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been depending to deter Putin from rebuilding his diminished military, restocking, and attacking again.

Global Concern

A separate side agreement according to sources would grant Ukraine with a similar to NATO protection assurance, in which any future "significant, intentional, and sustained aggression" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "will be treated as an assault jeopardizing the tranquility of the Western nations." That suggests a military response. Yet unlike a powerful national defense – the nation's primary defense against future hostilities – the credibility of the supplementary deal would hinge on the willingness of alliance members, including Trump, to act with force to Russia's aggression, a response they have {not