🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers introduced a new playlist called Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough format but features a few notable adjustments:

• Every squad has only eight real players, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two locations can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, this mode delivers on its title: it offers a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives additional choices for gamers looking for alternative ways to have fun with the game. However, if video games have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. Meanwhile, in community forums, one user notes, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," while another details all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this bot mode."

However, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states a different comment. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, players have constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it could increase wait times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of playlists currently available. On a similar note, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the community compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I had great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

If the development team has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed very quickly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, if their data indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.